<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Index Scan with Filter Predicate Based on a Subquery</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.antognini.ch/2012/02/index-scan-with-filter-predicate-based-on-a-subquery/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.antognini.ch/2012/02/index-scan-with-filter-predicate-based-on-a-subquery/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2013 12:28:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: SQLTXPLAIN: Execution plan and operation order : Exec Ord column &#124; Mohamed Houri’s Oracle Notes</title>
		<link>http://www.antognini.ch/2012/02/index-scan-with-filter-predicate-based-on-a-subquery/#comment-2190</link>
		<dc:creator>SQLTXPLAIN: Execution plan and operation order : Exec Ord column &#124; Mohamed Houri’s Oracle Notes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Jun 2013 10:01:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://antognini.ch/?p=1705#comment-2190</guid>
		<description>[...] rule is not applicable. Among those cases, I know two :  the  “constant subquery” and index scan with a filter predicate applying a subquery  0.000000 0.000000 Share this:EmailPrintLike this:Like Loading...   Leave a [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] rule is not applicable. Among those cases, I know two :  the  “constant subquery” and index scan with a filter predicate applying a subquery  0.000000 0.000000 Share this:EmailPrintLike this:Like Loading&#8230;   Leave a [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Missing Filter &#171; Oracle Scratchpad</title>
		<link>http://www.antognini.ch/2012/02/index-scan-with-filter-predicate-based-on-a-subquery/#comment-522</link>
		<dc:creator>Missing Filter &#171; Oracle Scratchpad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Feb 2012 21:31:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://antognini.ch/?p=1705#comment-522</guid>
		<description>[...] interesting little defect in Enterprise Manager a little while ago - it doesn&#8217;t always know how to interpret execution plans. The problem appears in Christians&#8217; example when a filter subquery predicate is applied [...] </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] interesting little defect in Enterprise Manager a little while ago - it doesn&#8217;t always know how to interpret execution plans. The problem appears in Christians&#8217; example when a filter subquery predicate is applied [...] </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christian Antognini</title>
		<link>http://www.antognini.ch/2012/02/index-scan-with-filter-predicate-based-on-a-subquery/#comment-521</link>
		<dc:creator>Christian Antognini</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Feb 2012 18:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://antognini.ch/?p=1705#comment-521</guid>
		<description>Hi Mohamed

Runtime statistics generated with gather_plan_statistics are based on sampling. Hence, they are not always accurate.

HTH
Chris</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Mohamed</p>
<p>Runtime statistics generated with gather_plan_statistics are based on sampling. Hence, they are not always accurate.</p>
<p>HTH<br />
Chris</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mohamed Houri</title>
		<link>http://www.antognini.ch/2012/02/index-scan-with-filter-predicate-based-on-a-subquery/#comment-520</link>
		<dc:creator>Mohamed Houri</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Feb 2012 16:38:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://antognini.ch/?p=1705#comment-520</guid>
		<description>Hi Christian,
Thanks a lot for this precision. From now and on I will make attention to explain plans showing an index scan with both access and filter predicate applying a subquery.

I often also see explain plans showing a A-Time of the parent operation being less than the sum of A-Time of its corresponding child operations as for example in the following example taken from an otn thread

&lt;pre&gt;TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID     &#124; OE_ORDER_HEADERS_ALL           &#124;   1075 &#124;   6485 &#124;     16M&#124;00:12:38.97 &#124;
 INDEX RANGE SCAN               &#124; OE_ORDER_HEADER_ALL_ORG_ID_NDX &#124;   1075 &#124;    141K&#124;    394M&#124;00:19:52.50 &#124;&lt;/pre&gt;

https://forums.oracle.com/forums/thread.jspa?messageID=10167734&amp;#10167734

How could this be possible ?

Best Regards

Mohamed Houri</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Christian,<br />
Thanks a lot for this precision. From now and on I will make attention to explain plans showing an index scan with both access and filter predicate applying a subquery.</p>
<p>I often also see explain plans showing a A-Time of the parent operation being less than the sum of A-Time of its corresponding child operations as for example in the following example taken from an otn thread</p>
<pre>TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID     | OE_ORDER_HEADERS_ALL           |   1075 |   6485 |     16M|00:12:38.97 |
 INDEX RANGE SCAN               | OE_ORDER_HEADER_ALL_ORG_ID_NDX |   1075 |    141K|    394M|00:19:52.50 |</pre>
<p><a href="https://forums.oracle.com/forums/thread.jspa?messageID=10167734&#038;#10167734" rel="nofollow">https://forums.oracle.com/forums/thread.jspa?messageID=10167734&#038;#10167734</a></p>
<p>How could this be possible ?</p>
<p>Best Regards</p>
<p>Mohamed Houri</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
